Sorry, but am I missing something here?
Since BH is based on original image, would it be right saying that Vu+ produces a device that is capable to receive also channels with non-standard parameters, but fails to provide a proper software for it while others can?
Although I used BH for a short period until I discovered how much better OBH was, I still fail to comprehend this logic.
Vu+ produce the hardware.
They also provide some software which is based on very old dmm engima2 coding, before dmm switched to close source coding.
OBH is based on OE-A enigma2 coding, which is compatible with OpenPLi enigma2 coding, which is far more modern than that used by Vu+ as there coding grew after dmm closed the sources, therefore OE-A images have more features and are more "technically" advanced, than images based on the standard Vu+ coding.
Hopefully I have explained that well enough for you and other users to understand.
As far as I am aware, Vu+ are the only manufacturer that provides both hardware and software support, all other E2 box manufacturers (as far as I am aware), provide only hardware, kernel and drivers, but no images or software support (excluding dmm with there closed source DreamOS).